Tuesday, January 5, 2010

The Conservative Case for Walking and Biking

Conservatives tend to believe that individuals should have as many choices as possible when it comes the decisions that affect their lives. This conviction is based on the belief that individuals know what is best for themselves and will ultimately make the right decisions, given all the options and information available.

Under our current transportation system, the majority of Nutmeggers and the majority of Americans for that matter, don’t have a whole lot of choice when comes to finding a way to get to work, shopping, school, etc. We have to drive.

We have to drive because our transportation policies have created a built environment that is downright hostile to pedestrians and cyclists, an environment that gives most of us little choice but to drive most of the time.

To a liberal concerned about the environment and our dependence on foreign oil this should be somewhat disturbing. To a conservative worried about big government dictating how we live our lives, this should be downright appalling.

The car is, and has been for some time now, an enduring symbol of the freedom and sense of possibility that is part of the American fabric. The car, coupled with the open road, boldly declares that anything is possible, that our destiny is ours to make. However, few things embody freedom, self-reliance, and self-sufficiency more than walking or biking to one’s destination. You are not on anyone else’s schedule. You leave when you decide to and travel by the route you choose – and you don’t pay anyone else a dime to do it. When walking or biking you are at once the driver and the engine. Even more so than the motorist, you are truly independent.

At some point in our history this was forgotten. Somewhere, somehow, walking and biking for transportation got pushed into the liberal column, where it has remained to this day. On local, state, and federal levels, we see liberals championing these causes, supporting funding for walking and biking infrastructure while conservatives like Rush Limbaugh, do their best to bitterly combat anything that doesn’t subsidize driving.

The obvious, but overlooked question here is: When did getting oneself from here to there using your own two feet become "liberal"? When did conservatives get the idea that providing you own transportation – that relying on your own muscle and sweat, as opposed to a gasoline engine – become something other than a virtue, something worthy of scorn and mockery, something to be discouraged? A true conservative would promote all forms of personal mobility.

Conservatives will often talk about how government should be as lean and efficient as possible. Spending taxpayer money is a serious issue and therefore, the government should utilize tax dollars in such a way as to provide the greatest level of service for the least expenditure.

The current auto-oriented transportation policy often championed by the conservative members of both the Connecticut General Assembly and the United States Congress is anything but cost-effective and efficient. Our state and federal gas taxes do not come close to paying for the highway system we all enjoy. This means that all citizens, no matter how much or how little they drive, end up subsidizing this costly system through their income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, and all manner of other fees levied on them by local, state, and federal governments. Any conservative worth his or her salt knows that if you want to lower taxes, you have to have an equivalent reduction in government spending (unless of course you’re a Republican member of congress, in which case you believe in tax-cuts funded by money borrowed from the Chinese). One way to reduce government spending is to develop a transportation system that moves people around as inexpensively as possible.

Our current dependence on the automobile for virtually each and every trip we make is an irresponsible and expensive indulgence that costs us all. Promoting walking and biking may currently be issues associated with the left, but they shouldn’t remain that way. Conservatives should embrace walking and biking, even if they don’t like the liberals and moderates who currently support it.

8 comments:

workbike said...

Oddly enough I was thinking about this earlier, having read an essay proclaiming "environmentalists want to destroy cars because they are representative of total freedom to go where we want, when we want" or words to that effect.
I'd suggest the opposite: You can drive a car, only when you take lessons certified by the state, and have a licence issued by the state. Your car must, likewise, be registered by the state, and you have to fulfill certain conditions the state lays down for insurance and other things. IN short, you'll be on half a dozen state agencie's lists by the time you hit the road.
Ah, yes, the road. This is essemntial to the 'freedom' of a car. Okay, some people drive SUV's but most drivers need that black flat surface to get anywhere. They are in fact imprisoned on this network. And who owns it? The state, or the county. Same difference. Either way you follow the routes decided by the government. And as one transport planner suggested, run on the soviet model: The citizens pay, the state runs it, and it's used by the people most willing to stand in line longest, with equipment from state-subsidized industry.
So, in total, apart for being a state-subsidized money guzzler (used by the rich and subsidized by the poor, no less)a car proclaims that you're a part of the state system, following the laws and requirements of the all-powerful government/industry.
So much for freedom.

Cap'n Transit said...

So, how about putting tolls back on the turnpike? And stopping the widenings planned east of New Haven? That would be the small-government thing to do, right?

John said...

I grapple with the oddity of conservatives' hatred of non-automobile alternatives regularly in my blog and while serving on my city's Economic Development Commission. The latest is here:
http://bit.ly/4zfDcg

It mystifies me.

Steven M. said...

"The bicycle is the true automobile."

Bike New Haven said...

Great post, Tom. Welcome Back!

On the question of political leadership, you're absolutely right- there's an ethical void on Capitol Hill, particularly on the Right. If you pay them, they will dance for you.

A little research over at opensecrets.org will confirm that conservatives receive a lot more than their Democratic counterparts in donations from both the oil and automotive industries. And, a lot of Democrats are not turning them away either.

As far as personal politics are concerned, it amazes me that anyone who defines themselves as a conservative would do anything other than walk or bike! It's the most fiscally responsible thing an American can do.

placemakinginstitute said...

The funny thing with Conservatives, especially those of the so-called Greatest Generation, is that they supposedly abhor collectivism (and yet they are quite good at forming collectives in order to should down other collectivists) and change. And yet what they are still espousing, ie we should continue our auto-centric sprawl, was in fact a radical break with the past at that time. If it was okay to do so then, why is it not okay to do so now?

http://placemakinginstitute.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/contriving-multi-modal-contrivances/

Michaelus said...

Maybe someone ought to get a big government program going to confiscate bicycles and sensible leather boots. This may get the requisite rage going - imagine Glen Beck weeping about how he loved his bike as a kid and Sarah Palin telling us they will take her hiking boots off her cold dead feet...

placemakinginstitute said...

Hahahaha!...And so very correct...(as a quick aside: Most Republicans are not Conservatives in any sense of the word beyond their espousal of social mores that kowtow to the voting block they need. The truest public Conservative this country has today is probably Texas' Ron Paul, and look at how his presidential campaign went...this is becoming a not very quick aside: It is, however, interesting to note how the Republican Party, which depends on 10% of this population to be so loud and vocal they appear to be 40% of this country, has been so successful with their embracement of corporate propaganda campaigns that, if you compare voting records, both our current president and Clinton were more Conservative than Nixon.)

A recent blog posting of mine received a comment that my finding this here blog post last week triggered this response to said comment: http://placemakinginstitute.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/all-austin-has-to-do-is-remember/

Post a Comment