tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6451501061157008528.post8544345121110906055..comments2009-01-25T20:52:58.263-05:00Editor - WalkBikeCThttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15651332530678360851noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6451501061157008528.post-62022213491785541092009-01-25T14:13:00.000-05:002009-01-25T14:13:00.000-05:00Streets must be evaluated on a case by case basis. In some cases, segregated facilities are greatly preferable, in others, they are not. It really depends on a variety of factors, including land use and commuting patterns.anonymoushttp://www.comcast.net/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6451501061157008528.post-59795767550452031312009-01-24T20:19:00.000-05:002009-01-24T20:19:00.000-05:00One rather large elephant in the room that is sometimes overlooked is the difference in automotive laws in Denmark and those in the US. Which IMHO favor cyclists and pedestrians versus the laws in the US that favor the automobile. Yet another issue IMHO with shared space is the laws of physics. What would be a love tap between a couple of cars at 10mph could be disastrous between a cyclist and a car. Until US drivers are adequately trained you will have a hard time convincing me shared space is the best choice. At this point in time we have little choice, so I will take what I can get.2whls3spdshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16954543886269776858noreply@blogger.com